{EAV:ba0e111cdeb54e7d} – Happy Easter
{EAV:ba0e111cdeb54e7d} – don’t work today; spend time with family and friends.
{EAV:ba0e111cdeb54e7d} – don’t work today; spend time with family and friends.
Mention the word ‘spec’ in a room of design professionals, and you will hear resonating boos and witness faces cringe in discontent. Why you may ask? Well it’s a slap in the face to say the least to the design and advertising community.
What is it?
Spec work is any type of work done by a creative individual (designer, copywriter, illustrator, etc.) for a potential client or future employer with no guarantee of compensation. On rare occasions, if the client likes the work provided, he/she may pay you, but probably not what the work is actually valued at. Crowdsourcing is just as unethical as spec. Basically, a company or a person announces a design job that’s available to everyone. Once they’ve received and reviewed all the free work that was submitted, they pick a winner. The winner would be the only one that gets compensated. Everyone else – suck it up buttercup. This may stump many people outside of the design industry. After all, what person in their right mind would work for free and have it actually be the norm? Exactly my point here. It’s ridiculous, and it should stop.
Where does it happen?
Better question – where DOESN’T it happen? When the US Department of Interior is crowdsourcing , you know the US is in trouble design-wise. Recently, the department announced they were in need of a new logo for their 65,000 plus employee agency. This would be a big job for a design firm or a professional freelancer to add to their portfolio. Instead, they went the cheap route and offered a mere $1,000 to the victor. Due to the fact that this is a government agency, it has stirred quite a bit of outrage within the design and advertising community. The actual value of a logo, which represents a company and is an integral part of their branding is NOT $1,000. According to The Graphic Artists Guild’s (Handbook of Pricing & Ethical Guidelines), the cost for a logo ranges from $20,000 – $50,000 which usually includes buyout of copyright.
Another well-known company that is doing the deed is…Huffington Post. They’re having a HuffPost Politics Icon Competition encouraging anyone to enter and posted this:
“Do you know your way around Photoshop or other design programs?”
So do they get paid? Not monetarily. The winner’s compensation is that they will use the winning logo and credit will go to the designer.
Does it really benefit client?
They seem to think so. They figure what a great deal to have a plethora of diverse logos/artwork to choose from and for cheap or even free in some instances. Here is a small list of reasons it actually hurts the client:
• Unoriginal and poor quality of ideas and designs
• You could be sued for trademark infringement
• “Designer” doesn’t have the time to ask questions about your company or service. They are not intimate, so chances of them creating a design that reflects you accurately is dim.
• Poor to no communication between the client and designer
• No time for research
• Chances of seeing a version of your design somewhere is VERY likely
How it hurts the designer
The way I see it, any designer who knows the value of their talent, experience, and skill will not and should not participate in these practices. It could possibly leave a scar on your design career because you are devaluing yourself. In today’s economic climate where design is not considered a commodity, it’s even more important to boldly claim your worth. For those young designers who are eager to get their work out there – THIS IS NOT THE WAY TO DO IT. Here are some reasons why:
• One by one, it devalues the entire design and advertising community
• Endless hours of design with no guarantee of compensation
• You as the designer are not protected when it comes to copyright
• Client chooses the design he/she simply likes, with no chance of the designer presenting his work and the rationale for his design
• Little time and usually no opportunity to revise designs
One way to do pro-bono work that is ethical is to check out some non-profit agencies and community groups who are in need of a logo or branding collateral. Another route could be to ask a friend or family member if they have any design needs and in return can offer a trade. This way you make it known that your work has value.
Is there ever a good opportunity to do it?
Spec work has been around for a long time, especially in advertising. Different firms may be offered an opportunity to present some initial concepts to a potential client in the hopes they will win the account. Previously, agencies made their money from media sales, and so creative work was given away as a way to profit from the media. Now this is not always the case, and each agency employs a different structure. An agency that’s starting out may be more inclined to include spec work in their proposals, whereas, a stable one wouldn’t dare. They figure they have paid their dues to be the strong agency they are – and they would be right.
Bottom line
No one is going to push you to do what you don’t want to do. The choice is yours. It’s based on your ethics and principles. I just caution you to be very careful and answer this question:
“When is the last time you went to the doctor, mechanic, attorney or grocery store and told them after services were rendered you will gladly pay for their service/product if and only you were satisfied?”
…Yeah I thought so
Links and Resources
• http://www.no-spec.com/
The world of design and production is filled with all kinds of fun terms. For those unfamiliar with the industry, the terms may sound imaginary, almost like going to a mechanic who tells you your flux capacitor needs to be fixed. So, how do you know your agency isn’t blowing smoke? Below are some common terms that sound funky, but trust us – they’re real and we know what we’re talking about.
Bleed – Printing an image past where the final print will be trimmed, which allows color to extend all the way to the edges of the final print.
Collect – Gathering the artwork, along with fonts and images, in the final format needed for output.
CMYK – Abbreviation for cyan, magenta, yellow and key (black), the four process colors.
Four-Color Process (4cp) – Any printing method that utilizes CMYK to create the illusion of different colors.
Gang – To combine multiple jobs on one print plate in order to reduce costs and set up charges.
Ghosting – When an image on one side of a document shows through to the other side.
High Res – Files which have a “high resolution” DPI or “dots per square inch” count.
Imposition – A layout of pages on mechanicals or flats so they will appear in proper order after press sheets are folded and bound.
Kerning – Adjusting the lateral space between letters.
Leading – The vertical spacing between lines of text.
Mock Up – A to-scale creation of the original printed material possibly containing instructions or directions.
PANTONE® Matching System (PMS) – Numbering system for identifying 3,000+ colors created through combinations of 14 primary color inks. The Pantone Company produces numerous color-matching systems for standard print and computer applications.
Pixelization – Process of enlarging image pixels to increase image size, resulting in jagged edges and blurry images.
Preflight – Process of checking a graphic file for potential problems before sending it for final output.
Spread – Two pages that face each other and are created as one visual or production unit.
TrueType – The most common format for fonts that work on both Mac OS and Microsoft Windows operating systems.
Vector Image – A computer image that uses geometrical primitives (such as points, lines, polygons and Bezier curves) to produce mathematical descriptions of paths for the graphic, which eliminates pixelization.
Wireframe – Is a visual guide that represents the skeletal framework of a website, like a blueprint.
Anyone who wants to talk like the designers do can pick up a Pocket Pal by International Paper. It’s a great resource for everything graphic arts related and here’s where you can find it: http://www.internationalpaper.com/US/EN/ Business/CPIP/PocketPal.html
If you’d like to skip the homework assignment and need some help from evok’s creative team – give us a call at 407.302.4416.

It’s clash of the titans in the mobile, tablet computing and mobile OS arena. With the crowds screaming for blood and mass confusion in the marketplace what is a consumer to do? As an advertising agency we constantly have to have our fingers on the pulse of the industry to see what emerging technologies and software are coming center stage to making sure we maximize our clients dollars while keeping them relevant. There is still no viable ecosystem in the mobile/tablet market place. Giants are emerging in the arena and some are even teaming up with long time foes to gain market share. Because of this, you are left with fragmentation, an over-saturated marketplace, way too many choices to make and compatibility issues.
Apple has created a niche for themselves and are the dominant force in hardware and software. But if Apple sours your stomach and you are feeling brave there are some sure bets to satisfy your computing needs. Google has shaken the Apple tree and Android has emerged as the forbidden fruit and a significant player while allowing other hardware companies to enter the battleground. The difference is that you can’t really compare the two or even the other players (Rim, Blackberry etc.). Apple’s hardware is only sold with their software where Android is purely software running on other manufacturer’s hardware. Even with Google’s recent purchase of Motorola I don’t think full integration will be seen in the marketplace until mid 2012. There are also so many flavors of Android that even getting apps to run on all machines cross-platform is an amazing feat.
Google was also tag-teamed recently by Apple and Microsoft when they purchased certain patents making it more expensive for anyone using Android and not Windows Phone OS. So obviously you can see who are the marketplace giants.
“But I just want to check my email and update Facebook and maybe play Angry Birds!” I feel your pain, in order for the market to unify we need to create an ecosystem and uniformity across a small group of dominant systems. The profitability of apps has been unparalleled and the shift in the way society has integrated into technology is amazing. So when it comes down to brass tacks and you the consumer have to make a decision what should you do? What goes on behind the scenes should not really influence your decision too much. Here is what you should consider:
1. Choose a device that will accomplish your basic needs.
2. Pick a reputable company that has made a commitment to their product line.
3. Look at the amount of applications available/compatible for your device.
4. Read the consumer blogs to see what your peers think of the device.
5. Look at Youtube for product reviews.
Now that we’ve covered that, let’s talk about what is on the horizon. If you purchase an Android device there is a new App store in the mix. Amazon is popping it’s collar with its own app store and right out-of-the-box are offering a ton of great applications. They are even giving one “Paid App” away everyday. I hope Google is ready for another throw down because this will seriously affect the Google Marketplace (their current app store). Not to mention, Amazon is gearing-up to enter the Tablet war with two new tablets code named “Coyote and Hollywood” with very low price points. I am sure this is directed at Apple so the rest of the year should get very interesting.
(Stay educated and happy shopping.)
- Christopher LeBlanc – Creative Director @ evok advertising
Follow me at @chriskleblanc or @evoklarry to get info, tips and relevant news.